|
|
Clients
Our principals and staff work on two or three major client
projects at any one time. Our work differs from client to client, and
no two projects have ever looked the same. Seeing a snapshot of our
current client work gives a sense of the variety of projects we
undertake and the range of our skills and experience. We identify
clients by name when we have their permission to do so.
Clemson University
On behalf of the Graduate Dean, we conducted an assessment of the
doctoral programs in preparation for the upcoming National Research Council
study. What are the implications of the study's taxonomy for the
University's doctoral programs, particularly in the Life Sciences? How
can faculty time be allotted both to accurately represent programs and
to give strategic advantage to the University? What specific steps will
the University need to take in order to ensure the long-term
competitiveness of its doctoral programs?
Florida International University
After we conducted an assessment of selected doctoral programs and
evaluated market opportunities for the College of Education, the Dean
of the Graduate School Doug Wartzok asked us to return and spearhead a
re-engineering of the graduate admission operation made necessary by
the University's migration to PeopleSoft. The project focused on
staff development, work process flows, performance standards, admission
policies, quality controls, and space planning.
Montclair State University
We completed a project that recommended the development
of new doctoral programs that are marketable and that will not
duplicate programming available elsewhere in the state of New Jersey.
The project began with an environmental scan that identified
approximately 60 possible programs; a marketability study that found 17
particular programs to have both a sizable market of incoming students
and a viable regional job market for program graduates; a feasibility
analysis that estimated the University's total financial investment
over a five-year period, including faculty, physical infrastructure,
student financial support, and marketing; and a directional document
that identified program development options for faculty, including
curriculum design, research thrusts, and promotional
paths. Provost Dick Lynde asked us to develop the
programs we recommended, including the
preparation of proposals for the New Jersey State Commission on Higher
Education.
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Yardley Research Group worked with Provost Joan Lorden and
selected academic services staff and faculty to improve the retention
and graduation rates of all student groups both graduate and
undergraduate, traditional and non-traditional. Initially, the
project focused on student advising systems developing general
principles and characteristics to which the University wants all
advising services to conform, facilitating an advising summit for
faculty and staff across the University that surveys and documents both
formal and informal advising, identifying linkages between advising and
student satisfaction, and establishing retention goals and developing
formative metrics to monitor the ongoing effectiveness of advising
services.
Mid-sized Public Research Intensive University in the Southeastern United StatesWe
are working with the Provost and Academic Affairs staff to identify
learning outcomes for the University's general education program and to
develop both advising programs to foster the development of those
outcomes and assessment systems to measure whether they have been
achieved. The project is taking place in the context of the
institution's preparation for re-accreditation by the Southern
Association of Colleges and Schools.
Large Private Research Extensive University in the Northeastern United StatesThis project involved
the development of market-focused strategic plans for all of the
University's doctoral programs, including benchmark improvement plans,
capacity studies, and external funding strategies. We worked on
revising the University's policies on tenure, promotion, and merit
review in order to foster interdisciplinary collaboration among faculty
from different departments and on defining overarching academic
initiatives to build the University's research profile.
|
|